Showing posts with label U2. Show all posts
Showing posts with label U2. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

No. 417: Boy


Band: U2
Album: Boy
Why Rolling Stone gets it right: Well, "I Will Follow" isn't the worst song I've ever heard.
Why Rolling Stone gets it wrong: It's U2's first record, which means it's the beginning of the end for decent music. It's self-indulgent and annoying.
Best song: Blah.
Worst song: Blah.
Is it awesome?: Come on, now.

I'm sorry, I really have nothing to say about this honking piece of junk. It was popular with the gay community, for what that's worth. Otherwise, I hate U2 and I hate this album.

Monday, November 5, 2007

No. 221: War


Band: U2
Album: War
Why Rolling Stone gets it right: "War" us U2's first and really only fully political album. The song hits topics unfamiliar to Americans like the Polish Solidarity movement or the IRA bombings that continued for years, but still had the resonance of a classic anti-violence or populist message.
Why Rolling Stone gets it wrong: It's still U2, so it's still preachy and stupid.
Best song: "Sunday Bloody Sunday" and "New Year's Day" remain the only two U2 songs I enjoy.
Worst song: "Two Hearts Beat as One" is terrible.
Is it awesome?: It isn't good, but it's not totally terrible.

Hey, everyone, we've finally found a U2 album I don't totally hate. For one, it has the only two songs I enjoy by U2. As well, I like the album's overt political tones, though I don't care for most of the actual songs.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnyyyywwwwwaaaaayyyy, let's talk a little bit about "Sunday Bloody Sunday." The song writes around the Northern Irish violence of the 70s and 80s, not taking a sectarian position.

Moreover, the song reflects the band's ability to weave the traditional Irish Catholic ethic into the lyrics. The song's closing lines, "claim the victory Jesus won…on [a] Sunday bloody Sunday" is the most overt, but to those unfamiliar with scripture, the song references Matthew 10:35 and 1 Corinthians 15:32 in the verses.

Musically, it brings in a military feel that hammers home the song's anti-violent theme. The military drum march, the chant and guitar arpeggio are undercut (wonderfully) by a chaotic violin.

---

I also enjoy "New Year's Day." In case Bono or The Edge or whatever is reading this, I'm not going to give them the satisfaction of fawning over two U2 songs, so, we'll leave it at that. It's a good song and it's about the Polish Solidarity movement.

---

There are other reasons to like "War." "Seconds" is an anti-nuclear war song, "The Refugee" is pretty overt and "Red Light" is about prostitution.

So, it's U2's best record, which, to me, is like being the smartest idiot. Still, it's better than anything else they did.

Thursday, September 6, 2007

No. 139: All That You Can’t Leave Behind


Band: U2
Album: All That You Can’t Leave Behind
Why Rolling Stone gets it right: Um, no.
Why Rolling Stone gets it wrong: The pompous fat band makes a concerted effort to "get back to their roots" is a theme overused by rock critics and bands alike. Basically, U2 had a colossal flop on their hands with "Pop," and decided "Hey, let's try and sell some damned records." I applaud the band's ability to write different themed songs, but the execution is the essence of middlebrow claptrap. Just enough emotion for idiots to understand it, not enough for it to have any actual, you know, meaning.
Best song: Zero. None.
Worst song: "Elevation" makes me want to die.
Is it awesome?: No.

I don't imagine U2 gets compared to the Black Eyed Peas a lot, but I'm going to do that here. When the Black Eyed Peas came out with "My Humps" and "Don't Phunk With My Heart," I was torn. On one hand, I applaud the group's move towards a more interesting sound. Those two songs are considerably different than a lot of what was popular at the time and it did push the limits -- albeit in a moronic way -- of what a pop song could be.

On the other hand, those songs suck eggs. They're terrible. Just plain terrible.

I'll say something similar about "All That You Can’t Leave Behind." On one hand, there are songs on the album that explore mortality and aging; Themes not often explored in rock and roll.

However, if you actually listen to the lyrics, you'll find a half-retarded stab at emotion that echoes the kind of middle-of-the-road nonsense that only idiots find meaningful.

In short, this album is the reason I despise U2.

I don't know how easy it is to keep your proverbial fastball into your 30s and 40s; I'm 26 and and not a particularly creative type. I know there are scores of bands that did drop off as they got older. That appears to be the way of the world in music.

---

Things that annoy me about Bono:

  • His awful voice.

  • His lyrics that sound like a 15-year-old wrote them.

  • How he only plays the guitar on, like, four songs.

  • His damned glasses.

  • His idiotic comments on pop culture and consumerism, despite the fact that his music is exactly that (see "Pop" and "Achtung Baby").

  • His constant need to attention to the work he does with the poor. He's quick to take credit for every philanthropic thing he does as if saying "Look at me! I'm a good person!"

  • That he actually said -- after winning Grammys, no less -- "[We're] reapplying for the job. What job? The best band in the world job." No, buddy, that title belongs to someone else. Anyone else.


Things that I like about Bono:

  • Even though he's a pompous ass and is quick to act like he's saving the world single-handedly, he is actually trying to help people. That's more than I can say for a lot of musicians.

  • He was the subject of the fabulous "Kill Bono" SST Records t-shirt during the '80s.



---

Why do people like U2? Is it because people are lazy and just want the familiar? U2 is nothing if not familiar, if only because they're been around the top of the charts for 30 years now. "All That You Can’t Leave Behind" is a decided effort to sound familiar, even enlisting Brian Eno and Daniel Lanois to produce the album.

All you need to know about the album is that the three singles -- those considered to be the best songs on the album -- are absolute garbage. I don't want to sound like I'm discounting Michael Hutchence's suicide; It was a tragic thing and Hutchence was a very talented individual. But that half-hearted attempt at exploring those emotions in "Stuck in a Moment You Can't Get Out Of" is misguided at best. Not to mention that they have a video using John Madden and a football game... Ugh. What a mess.

The album opener, "Beautiful Day" is even more of a mess. The record's theme -- a man who finds beauty in everyday life after a he's having a bad day -- is idiotic and emphasizes the band's middle class quasi populist appeal. I can see the morons empathizing with the lyrics: "hey, Bono knows that traffic sucks, too! He knows that rent is expensive! Wow! It's like he's speaking for me!" This person is an idiot.

(Again, the video has all the pomposity we have come to know from U2. Echoing a the Backstreet Boys video, the band hangs out around their private jet -- hey, did you know that they're rich? -- and around the airport. Awesome. You guys travel.)

"Elevation" is a song that anyone who watched TV in 2002 knows because it was on one of the iPod ads that ran nonstop during that year. It was on the "Tomb Raider" movie soundtrack and got a lot of of play on the radio. Like the idiotic "Batman Forever" single ("Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me, Kill Me"), the song is based on a mediocre guitar lick and Bono screaming easy-to-rhyme lyrics.

Even U2 fans know this. here's part of the opening paragraph on the song's Wikipedia page:

Featuring a thunderous beat, a variety of sound effects on the central guitar riff, and an easy rhyming lyric for the audience to shout along with, it was highly effective in that concert-starting role and became a hit in the United States and the United Kingdom.


(Emphasis mine)

It's a crowd-pleaser, I'm sure. Only U2 could write a song specifically for chanting at a concert and people would be happy. Man, I hate this band.

---

This album is why I hate U2. Based on years of radio play, listeners believe that U2 has some sort of talent and/or credibility. in reality, though, they're just a crappy band trying to make the easiest hits they can by using easy-to-repeat slogans, low-grade emotion and retarded middle class optimism. That's not good music.

Monday, July 16, 2007

No. 62: Achtung Baby


Band: U2
Album: Achtung Baby
Why Rolling Stone gets it right: "Achtung Baby" is the album that made U2 into the superstar band they are today. Led by three huge singles ("One," "Mysterious Ways" and "Even Better Than The Real Thing"), the record sold massively and U2 used it to to launch their giant Zoo TV tour.
Why Rolling Stone gets it wrong: What's exciting about this album? "One" is a nice little track, on some level, but, otherwise, what distinguishes this record from anything other rock and roll record? Bono is blowing hard about some damned thing. Edge is "effect"ing up his guitar (Delay! Wah wah!) and the rhythm section is out banging supermodels.
Best song: I hate U2 and this is part of the reason. This album isn't any good, but it's considered better than, say, "Invisible Touch." "One" isn't total sewage, though that's because I have an R.E.M. bootleg where they play it and it's just OK.
Worst song: All of them, though "Even Better Than The Real Thing" is particularly bad. The song sounds like a commercial jingle and the chorus basically sounds like something out of an ad agency. "Try U2 Cola: Even better than the real thing!" Fuck you.
Is it awesome?: Absolutely, positively no.

I wish I was done writing about U2. There are few bands I despise more. "Achtung Baby" typifies this. "Mysterious Ways" is just a wah-wah disco bit love song, but it was received like a great track. "One" is, lyrically, a jaded "Imagine," but is still considered the theme song to the peace movement, the save Darfur movement, the AIDS research movement, the give Bono money movement, etc. And I've already bitched about the advertising sound of "Even Better Than The Real Thing."

This album makes me want to throw up.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

No. 26: The Joshua Tree


Band: U2
Album: The Joshua Tree
Why Rolling Stone gets it right: This is the album that really changed U2 from a Euro lite punk/New Wave band into one of the world's most popular rock and roll acts. The first three tracks were all top 15 singles and the videos for "With or Without You" and "Where the Streets Have No Name" are considered iconic by many.
Why Rolling Stone gets it wrong: The more famous U2 becomes, the more insufferable Bono becomes. You know my biases.
Best song: I don't like U2, so I find the whole album to be pretty crappy.
Worst song: "Bullet The Blue Sky" is awful.
Is it awesome?: People love U2. I don't.

U2 recorded "The Joshua Tree" in an attempt to Americanize their sound. The album is thematically a tribute to the United States and include varying different songs about the American experience, presumably through the eyes of Europeans.

The record's sound is very American. Bono's lyrics reference the great wide skies of the West, as do the novella-style storytelling about mining towns and "God's Country." Like many Europeans, the American West clearly fascinated U2.

Supposedly, the band befriended the likes of Bob Dylan, Van Morrison and Keith Richards before they recorded this album. The influence towards a more soulful, blues and rock-based record shows. Clearly, this was U2's most rock and roll record at the time and it became their most successful.

Look, I'm not going to lie, I hate U2, but mostly because of the accolades placed on them. I don't think their music (or any music, really) is god-awful or worthless. I just don't like it. It bores me and I find it to be meaningful only to people who can't bother to change the radio dial. "The Joshua Tree" is like that. It's Tocqueville for retards. That's not America, Bono. That's cowboy nonsense.

The singles were huge. It was a turning point for the band. The album still stinks.